Infodeck vs eMaint (Fluke): CMMS Comparison (2026)
Infodeck vs eMaint
Compare IoT capabilities, reliability features, Fluke integration, and pricing to find the right CMMS for your maintenance operations.
Quick Summary
Infodeck
Best for: IoT-enabled facilities, real-time sensor monitoring, predictive maintenance, smart buildings, continuous monitoring
eMaint (Fluke)
Best for: Reliability-centered maintenance, Fluke device users, periodic testing programs, electrical maintenance
At a Glance
| Infodeck | eMaint (Fluke) | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 | 1986 (acquired by Fluke 2016) |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Florida & New Jersey, USA |
| Focus | IoT-first CMMS with smart workflows | Reliability-centered maintenance |
| IoT Support | Native LoRaWAN, AWS IoT, webhooks | Fluke Connect devices |
| Best For | Real-time sensor monitoring | Periodic testing programs |
| Deployment | Cloud-native SaaS | Cloud (SaaS) |
Company Background
About the Companies
Understanding the ecosystem behind each platform
| Aspect | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Company focus | IoT-first CMMS | Reliability maintenance |
| Parent company | Independent | Fluke Corporation |
| Primary market | Smart buildings, manufacturing | Industrial, electrical |
| Technology focus | IoT sensors, automation | Fluke devices, reliability |
| Ecosystem | Open IoT protocols | Fluke Connect devices |
Note
eMaint's acquisition by Fluke provides unique integration with Fluke testing equipment, while Infodeck focuses on open IoT protocols for broader sensor compatibility.
Work Order Management
Work Order Capabilities
Core maintenance task management features
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Create work orders | ✅ | ✅ |
| Assign to users/teams | ✅ | ✅ |
| Priority levels | ✅ | ✅ |
| Due dates & SLA | ✅ | ✅ |
| Recurring schedules | ✅ | ✅ |
| Auto-create from sensor data | ✅ | Limited |
| Condition-based triggers | ✅ | Limited |
| Work order templates | ✅ | ✅ |
| Nested work orders | ✅ | ✅ |
| Labor tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
Winner: Infodeck
Both handle standard work orders well. Infodeck's continuous sensor-triggered work orders provide more proactive maintenance than periodic testing.
Asset Management
Asset Tracking Features
Managing equipment and maintenance history
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Asset registry | ✅ | ✅ |
| Asset hierarchy | ✅ | ✅ |
| Maintenance history | ✅ | ✅ |
| QR code scanning | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom fields | ✅ | ✅ |
| Real-time sensor data | ✅ | Limited |
| IoT device linking | ✅ Native | Fluke Connect |
| Parts & inventory | ✅ | ✅ |
| Failure tracking | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
| MTTR/MTBF analysis | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
Winner: Tie
eMaint has strong reliability analysis. Infodeck excels at real-time connected assets.
IoT & Sensor Integration
IoT Capabilities
Key differentiator between platforms
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Native IoT support | ✅ | Limited |
| LoRaWAN integration | ✅ (ChirpStack, TTN) | ❌ |
| AWS IoT integration | ✅ | ❌ |
| Fluke Connect integration | ❌ | ✅ Native |
| Webhook integrations | ✅ | ✅ |
| Real-time sensor dashboards | ✅ | Limited |
| Threshold alerts | ✅ | ✅ |
| Condition-based work orders | ✅ Continuous | Periodic |
| Temperature monitoring | ✅ Continuous | Via Fluke devices |
| Vibration monitoring | ✅ Continuous | Via Fluke devices |
| Electrical testing | ❌ | ✅ Via Fluke |
Winner: Depends on approach
Infodeck provides continuous real-time monitoring. eMaint offers Fluke testing device integration for periodic measurements. Different philosophies.
Monitoring Approaches
Infodeck: Continuous Monitoring
• Sensors report data 24/7
• Instant alerts when thresholds breach
• Historical trend analysis
• No manual measurements needed
• Works with any LoRaWAN/IoT sensor
eMaint: Periodic Testing
• Technicians take measurements
• Fluke device data uploads
• Scheduled testing programs
• Professional-grade testing tools
• Strong for electrical/reliability
Reliability-Centered Maintenance
RCM Features
Reliability-centered maintenance capabilities
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Failure mode tracking | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
| Root cause analysis | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
| MTTR tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| MTBF tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Asset criticality | ✅ | ✅ |
| RCM workflows | Basic | ✅ Strong |
| Failure prediction | ✅ (sensor-based) | ✅ (historical) |
| PM optimization | ✅ | ✅ |
Winner: eMaint
eMaint has deeper reliability-centered maintenance features due to Fluke's heritage. Infodeck uses real-time data for predictive insights.
Mobile Experience
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| iOS app | ✅ | ✅ |
| Android app | ✅ | ✅ |
| Offline mode | ✅ | ✅ |
| Push notifications | ✅ | ✅ |
| Barcode/QR scanning | ✅ | ✅ |
| Photo attachments | ✅ | ✅ |
| Fluke Connect sync | ❌ | ✅ |
| Meter readings | ✅ | ✅ |
Winner: Tie
Both have solid mobile apps. eMaint has Fluke Connect sync; Infodeck has IoT dashboard access.
Reporting & Analytics
| Feature | Infodeck | eMaint |
|---|---|---|
| Standard reports | ✅ | ✅ |
| Custom reports | ✅ | ✅ |
| Dashboard widgets | ✅ | ✅ |
| KPI tracking | ✅ | ✅ |
| Export to CSV/PDF | ✅ | ✅ |
| Real-time sensor charts | ✅ | Limited |
| Reliability reports | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
| MTTR/MTBF reports | ✅ | ✅ Strong |
| Cost analysis | ✅ | ✅ |
| Scheduled reports | ✅ | ✅ |
Pricing Comparison
Infodeck Pricing
Lite — Small teams
Basic — Growing organizations
Professional — API + IoT
Enterprise — Full IoT + SSO
IoT included in Professional and Enterprise.
eMaint Pricing
Team — ~$69/user/mo
Professional — ~$85/user/mo
Enterprise — Custom pricing
Fluke devices are separate purchases.
Ideal Use Cases
Choose Infodeck If:
• Continuous monitoring — 24/7 sensor data needed
• IoT-first — Real-time dashboards priority
• Smart buildings — HVAC, energy, environment
• Automated alerts — Instant threshold notifications
• Open protocols — LoRaWAN, AWS IoT flexibility
• Cold chain — Always-on temperature monitoring
Choose eMaint If:
• Fluke users — Already using Fluke devices
• Reliability focus — RCM methodology important
• Electrical maintenance — Testing programs key
• Periodic testing — Scheduled measurement rounds
• Failure analysis — Deep root cause tracking
• Testing equipment — Professional-grade tools
Integration Ecosystems
What They Connect With
Understanding the integration landscape
The Bottom Line
Summary
Infodeck is the better choice for organizations that want continuous real-time monitoring, automated alerts, and flexible IoT sensor integration.
eMaint is better for organizations focused on reliability-centered maintenance with periodic testing programs, especially those already using Fluke equipment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Fluke devices with Infodeck?
Infodeck doesn't have native Fluke Connect integration. However, you can manually log measurements or use webhooks to connect data. For continuous monitoring, Infodeck's native IoT sensors provide always-on data.
Which is better for predictive maintenance?
Different approaches: Infodeck uses continuous sensor data for real-time condition monitoring. eMaint uses periodic Fluke measurements and reliability analysis. Continuous monitoring typically catches issues faster.
Does eMaint support LoRaWAN sensors?
eMaint doesn't have native LoRaWAN support. It focuses on Fluke device integration. If you need LoRaWAN sensors, Infodeck is the better choice.
Can I migrate from eMaint to Infodeck?
Yes, both platforms support data export. Core data like assets, work orders, and history can be migrated. Contact our team for migration assistance.
Ready to Try Infodeck?
Have questions about switching from eMaint? Contact our team for migration assistance.